Corpus-derived grammatical subtext and the origins of political correctness in Kenworth’s dramatic adaptation of Orwell’s Animal Farm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/analiff.2026.38.1.4Кључне речи:
collocation, semantic prosody, insincerity, corpus-derived subtext, grammatical subtext, quasi-propositional variables, Contextual Prosodic Theory, corpus stylistics, Louw, OrwellАпстракт
In his seminal paper on semantic prosody [SP], Louw (1993) dwells on the deviations from the language norm, proposing that breaches of SP must amount to either authorial irony or inadvertent insincerity. While SP was initially studied from the point of view of lexical collocation, Louw’s later work focused on the study of grammatical subtext, but never specifically on its potential to point up irony or insincerity in discourse. This paper connects Louw’s understanding of inadvertent insincerity with the notion of political correctness in the context of Kenworth’s dramatic adaptation of Orwell’s Animal Farm, and posits three hypotheses: that grammatical subtext will account for implied negative attitudes in texts (H1); that grammatical subtext will explain hidden rhetorical mechanisms behind overt negative attitudes in texts (H2); and that language suffering under the restrictions of political correctness may be qualified as forced (H3). The methodology deployed relies on Louw’s defining grammatical subtext as the sum of the most frequent lexical variables of a grammar string (Louw, 2010). After the study was properly contextualised by interpreting the role of grammar in an Orwellian society, an excerpt from the dramatic adaptation was chosen in which one of the main characters admits to being manipulative and then engages in manipulation. On the basis of two wordings found in the excerpt, the paper defends the first two hypotheses. As for the third, it was found that defending it requires a different context of situation. Ultimately, the findings suggest that it is possible to prove manipulative intent on the basis of lexical collocates of a grammar string, and, additionally, that grammatical subtext alone may be the basis of the rhetorical strategy of faulty emotional appeal. Both findings may be taken as evidence of and as an improvement on the initial speculations of Louw.
Downloads
Downloads
Објављено
Број часописа
Рубрика
Лиценца
Овај рад је под Creative Commons Aуторство-Дели под истим условима 4.0 Интернационална лиценца.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in the journal Anali filološkog fakulteta by the Faculty of Philology, University of Belgrade (Faculty of Philology, Studentski trg 3, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia). Author’s name will be evident in the printed article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
